The variation agreed on site
The ceiling grid change was agreed verbally three weeks ago. It went in, it cost you labour and materials, and nobody has priced it, signed it off or invoiced it.
OrcaScale builds bespoke quoting, job tracking and certificate systems for UK contractors, subcontractors, M&E and fit-out firms of roughly 5 to 50 people. Built around how your firm prices and runs work, not how a software company thinks you should.
Not hypotheticals. This is the week that turns up, one way or another, in almost every conversation we have with a contractor.
The ceiling grid change was agreed verbally three weeks ago. It went in, it cost you labour and materials, and nobody has priced it, signed it off or invoiced it.
Handover is Friday and the EICR still is not in. The electrician is on another site, the paperwork is in a van, and the client will not release anything without it.
An evening rebuilding a quote in Excel from the last similar job, ringing round for supplier prices. Sent it Thursday. Lost on price to a firm that guessed in twenty minutes.
The rates and margins that actually win work sit in one estimator's head. When they are on holiday, or if they ever leave, quoting stops with them.
Three WhatsApp groups, a whiteboard and a diary. Snagging lists on paper, RAMS in email threads, day rates in someone's notes. You find out a job slipped when the client rings.
Valuations, retentions and unpaid variations tracked nowhere in particular. The month turns out to have been bad, and the bank balance is the first thing to say so.
None of this is a people problem. It is what happens when a firm that prices and runs work in its own particular way tries to hold that work in tools that were never shaped around it. The fix is a system shaped around your way, and that is the only kind we build.
Ducky Construction is our flagship build: a complete quoting and project management platform for a UK construction firm, live and demonstrable today.
Greg, the owner, was spending around 8 hours building each quote and writing roughly 5 quotes a week: 40 hours every week just on quoting, before supplier emails, progress tracking and chasing client approvals. We took his real categories, his real preset rates and his real workflow, and built the platform around them.
Maybe. Genuinely. Off-the-shelf job management tools are good software, they cost about as much as a round of bacon rolls, and for plenty of firms they are the right answer.
Not slides, not a proposal document. A real running system, built around your operation, that you click through before any money changes hands.
About ten minutes at /builder: how work comes in, how you price it, where the time goes, what you use now, who needs access. Ed reads every application himself.
If it is a fit, he builds a working demo of your system, usually within 3 to 7 days. Real software with your workflow in it, not a mock-up or a slide deck.
You click through it together and decide if it is worth taking further. If it misses, you walk away owing nothing, and you keep the written requirements to take elsewhere.
He only takes on a few free builds a month, so not every application gets one. It is how he decides which projects he can do properly, and it cuts both ways.
Once your system is live, one optional monthly care plan covers keeping it healthy and moving: you run jobs, we run the software. It is part of the offer, priced with your build quote before you commit to anything.
And it is optional either way. The system is yours: you own the code, the data and the database, whether you take a care plan or not. Full details are in the FAQ.